Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 10:08

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why did Britain steal Gibraltar from Spain?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Exclusive: Clean energy investment hits new highs and shows no sign of slowing - TechCrunch
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Quidem dolorum id soluta eius id maxime quas.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Genetic variant tied to doubled dementia risk for older men - The Washington Post
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?